30-for-30: Computed Tomography Education Sessions

30 for 30 computed tomography sessions

We are officially 30 days out from our 18th Annual Computed Tomography Symposium in San Francisco and it’s safe to say we are getting a little excited. All the pieces are falling into place and our registration is higher than it’s ever been. We are building an amazing program for you and are looking forward to this CT meeting to be the most innovative gathering of radiology minds we have ever hosted.

In celebration of our 30-day countdown, we thought we’d highlight 30 of the talks we are most looking forward to:

  1. Improvement in Spatial Resolution Using Iterative Reconstruction: Patrik Rogalla, MD
  2. Potential Clinical Ramifications of Dose Alert on CT-Guided Interventional Procedures: Cynthia McCollough, PHD, FAAPM, FACR
  3. Debate Session on Single Beat CT for Coronary Arteries - Eh, Who Needs It? (Not Me vs. Me): Joseph Schoepf, MD and Jonathan Leipsic, MD
  4. CT Dose and Image Quality- What are we still learning and how are we still testing limits?: Dianna Bardo, MD
  5. Coronary Artery Stenosis Evaluation Workstation Demonstration: Koen Nieman, MD and Suhny Abbara
  6. Functional and High Pitch CT Imaging of Cardiac Trauma: Patrick McLaughlin, MD
  7. Update on CT Myocardial Perfusion: Thomas Henzler, MD
  8. The Effect of IV Contrast on Renal Function in Patients on Metformin: Judy Yee, MD
  9. CT of Calyceal Abnormalities in the Kidney- Pearls and Pitfalls: Elliott Fishman, MD
  10. Dual Energy CT Fat Fraction for Characterizing Adrenal Nodules: Aaron Sodickson, MD
  11. Debate on Value of Volumetric Assessment at Abdominal CT Beyond Oncology: Perry PIckhardt, MD and Patrick McLaughlin, MD
  12. Imaging Predictors of Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Beyond Traditional Staging Criteria: Bhavik Patel, MD
  13. Controversy: The Role of Volumetric Analysis in Abdominal CT Beyond Oncology: Drs. Davenport, McLaughlin and Pickhardt
  14. Debate on whether or not Perfusion CT Outside the Head is Dead – William Shuman, MD and Patrick Rogalla, MD
  15. Strategies for Improving I mage Q uality on Dual Energy CT -reconstructed M onoenergetic Images: Daniele Marin, MD
  16. Dual Energy CT of the Abdomen & Pelvis: Multi-Institutional Consensus on Image Reconstruction and Interpretation Workflow: Rendon Nelson, MD
  17. Does Dual Energy CT Really Add Value in the ED?: Michael Lev, MD
  18. Is a Portal Venous Phase DECT Exam Sufficient for Evaluation of Pancreatic Mass and Preoperative Staging?: Dushyant Sahani, MD
  19. Dual Energy Postprocessing Workflow and PACS Workstation Demonstrations: Drs. Jacob Sosna, Dushyant Sahani, Benjamin Yeh
  20. Lung Screening: Do's and Don'ts: Mathias Prokop, MD
  21. Controversy- Is it worthwhile to implement a Lung Cancer Screening Program?: Jared Christenson, MD
  22. Debate on Imaging Quantification of Pulmonary Embolism: Drs. Joseph Schoepf and Charles White
  23. Penetrating Aortic Ulcer Versus Pseudoaneurysm: Where is the line?: Michael Hope, MD
  24. Simplify Managing your Protocols with a Master Protocol Concept: Myron Pozniak, MD
  25. Workstation Demonstrations on Volume Rendering and Vascular Measurements: Geoffrey Rubin, MD
  26. Debate: Should 3D Post Processing Be Done by a Radiology Technologist, a Radiologist or Both?: Drs. Elliot Fishman and Dominik Fleischmann, and Shannon Walters
  27. Workstation Demonstration - Infant with Complex Congenital Heart Disease: Dianna Bardo
  28. Is that Head CT Really Normal? "Don't Miss" Post-traumatic and Non-traumatic Lesions: Michael Lev, MD
  29. Why Radiologists Should use Twitter Professionally: Jenny Hoang, MD
  30. Controversy - To do or not to do Structured Reporting for CT?: Chris Roth, MD
Previous
Previous

Faculty Spotlight: Radiology Extraordinaire Bhavik Patel, MD, MBA

Next
Next

9 Signs Your Radiology Team Should Attend ISCT’s Computed Tomography Meeting